Letters to the Editor

Orrico's message on wrong track

I was recently dismayed to receive Vicki Orrico’s sleazy flyer attacking Conrad Lee, her opponent for City Council, Position 2. But the sleaziness was less disturbing than the message: Ms. Orrico promises aggressive leadership in mindlessly orchestrating an uncritical, lemming-like leap to Light Rail for Bellevue.

Light rail leaves a sad history across the American landscape. The city of Milwaukee, made a serious study of these issues over a decade ago, [Reference: “Light Rail in Milwaukee”, Wisconsin Policy Institute Rpt, V11, #3, March 1998 ]. In the summary, their report paints “a picture of LR NOT fulfilling its promises of: i) reducing congestion and pollution, and ii) switching riders to public transportation.” The reasons: i) Multiple light rail lines built in the U.S. over the past 2-3 decades have provided virtually NO REDUCTION of traffic congestion and, consequently, NO REDUCTION in air pollution; ii) The percent of commuters using transit has DECLINED in all major metropolitan areas, including those with LR; iii) As residences and jobs have spread to the suburbs, citizens rightly perceive that much of their travel can ONLY be practically accomplished by auto; iv) Even the most cost-effective LR systems require annual taxpayer subsidies (ie, beyond user fare revenues) of $5,000 and more per new rider — enough to fund leasing each his own auto.

Despite these facts, some theorists envision a new American urbanism in which automobile use is displaced by transit, with citizens re-deploying to dense urban areas developed around rail transit stations. Stated simply, this philosophy strives to drive Bellevue-ites out of our lovely neighborhoods and into high rise units.

So, fellow Bellevue-ites, if this is the future you’d like to see, then YES - - you should vote for Ms. Orrico’s uncritical advocacy. But if you agree that Bellevue is worth preserving and expanding - then I urge you to dismiss her “Ready, Fire, Aim” approach. Rather, fellow Bellevue-ites, cast your vote for the more experienced judgment of the present incumbent.

Mark Sussman, Bellevue

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Read the latest Green Edition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Jul 25 edition online now. Browse the archives.