Carlson misses point on Capitol atheist sign


December 12, 2008 · 9:55 AM

  • 0
  • Print Story
  • Letter/Editor

John Carlson seems to be missing the fundamental point of the atheists’ display at the capitol. (See: "Christmas chaos at the Capitol.") Due to the separation of church and state clause of the First Amendment, if you allow one religion to have a display, you have to allow a display for any religion - be it Muslim, Hindu, Scientologist, or Flying Spaghetti Monster - or even a display for non-religion, such as the atheists.

If you allow one, but disallow another, that shows favoritism, which the amendment does not allow.

If Carlson wants a “Christmas display” at the capitol, what’s wrong with a decorated tree, or a snowman, or reindeer? Why an explicitly religious symbol, like the nativity? If he wants a nativity scene, why doesn’t he put it in his front yard, or in front of a church? Indeed, Gov. Gregoire could’ve avoided this mess - by, very simply, not allowing the menorah or nativity in the first place. The displays should be kept entirely secular. This is fair to everybody, and doesn’t discriminate.

Brent Bartlett

Bellevue

Comment on this story.

COMMENTING RULES: We encourage an open exchange of ideas in our online community, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. In a nutshell, don't say anything you wouldn't want your mother to read.

So keep your comments:

  • Civil
  • Smart
  • On-topic
  • Free of profanity

We ask that all participants own their words by logging in with their Facebook account. It's a simple process that will take seconds and helps keep our comments free of trolls, cranks, and “drive-by” commenters. We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using screen names, pseudonyms or false identities. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

blog comments powered by Disqus