Letters to the Editor

Change to school district's Prism program wrong option

As a grandparent of a 4th and 7th grader who have thrived in Bellevue School District Prism program, I was dismayed at the changes the district proposed for the program this fall.

My understanding is the changes are, at least in part, a response to parents of students in the district's enrichment program who are dissatisfied with the part-time nature of that program. As a result, elementary Prism students will be combined with those in the enrichment program with the combined classes split into two different school paths. This seems like a poor solution for both the Prism and enrichment students.

I understand that the addition of the enrichment students would double or triple the number of students included. If so, surely there are enough enrichment students to justify full time classes at each school.

Combining the two groups also would seem to reduce the Prism program's appeal to those from other school districts resulting in less revenue for the district. The costs involved in training teachers for the new enrichment program would be far less than training them for both enrichment and Prism-level students.

Bill Hirt, Bellevue

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

Read the latest Green Edition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Oct 24 edition online now. Browse the archives.

Friends to Follow

View All Updates