Proposed land use change removes important safeguards in development process | Letter

While many Bellevue residents were enjoying spring break, the Bellevue City Council began considering a change to the city’s Land Use Code that would remove a critical step in the review of controversial projects like the Eastgate men’s shelter, the Northtowne fire station, Sound Transit 3, and PSE’s big transmission line named “Energize Eastside.”

If adopted, the change would make a city-appointed judge the final decider on the merits of these projects. If residents or small businesses disagree with a decision, they could no longer appeal to their elected representatives on the city council. Instead, they would have to raise hundreds of thousands of dollars to take the issue to court, where they would face a formidable array of high-priced lawyers representing the interests of developers or multi-billion dollar corporations like PSE.

Why is this change being contemplated? Some say that these issues have become too complex for part-time council members to understand. That is ridiculous. Several of our current council members are attorneys. One is actually a land use attorney. Another holds a Ph.D. Two have served as mayor of Bellevue. Is a state or county judge more qualified to determine what’s best for Bellevue than people who live here and are elected to represent us?

By removing an important safeguard in the development process, this proposal degrades democracy and further jeopardizes our “City in a Park.” Council members may like the idea of removing themselves from controversial and politically risky votes, but is this good governance?

In council elections this fall, citizens should consider whether to support a council member who votes to give powerful developers a further advantage over people who love Bellevue and call it home.

Don Marsh


More in Letters to the Editor

Lawmakers shielded from public scrutiny | Letter

Legislators don’t want the citizens to know who is buying their vote.

Why would PSE propose unnecessary project? | Letter

Few know that PSE is proposing a project that will cost ratepayers over $1 billion.

The dichotomy of tolling and internet neutrality | Letter

Net neutrality gives everyone an equal path to their destination.

Americans should advocate for upheaval of unequal systems | Letter

Americans should advocate for an upheaval of outdated systems that are fundamentally unequal.

Support for HB 2967 | Letter

Washington needs a more equitable and stable funding plan to support our schools.

Let’s continue to study safe injection sites to combat opioid addiction | Letter

These sites reduce opioid deaths and also offer other medical services.

Bellevue needs terrific pool facility

To have a terrific pool facility that will serve all ages is good for the Eastside.

Senior lives matter too | Letter

You’re killing the geese who laid the golden eggs for the last five-plus decades.

Scary minutes in Hawaii | Letter

How much longer do we, as a nation have to put up… Continue reading

‘Overwhelming’ attendance at Muslim, immigrant safety event | Letter

Last year, the Muslim Community and Neighborhood Association organized a Muslim safety… Continue reading

Bellevue’s energy dilemma | Letter

The city of Bellevue is facing a major decision within the next… Continue reading

Region deserves better than 3-county albatross | Letter

Regarding Bill Hirt’s letter (Jan. 5) on Sound Transit. Sadly, Sound Transit… Continue reading