Proposed land use change removes important safeguards in development process | Letter

While many Bellevue residents were enjoying spring break, the Bellevue City Council began considering a change to the city’s Land Use Code that would remove a critical step in the review of controversial projects like the Eastgate men’s shelter, the Northtowne fire station, Sound Transit 3, and PSE’s big transmission line named “Energize Eastside.”

If adopted, the change would make a city-appointed judge the final decider on the merits of these projects. If residents or small businesses disagree with a decision, they could no longer appeal to their elected representatives on the city council. Instead, they would have to raise hundreds of thousands of dollars to take the issue to court, where they would face a formidable array of high-priced lawyers representing the interests of developers or multi-billion dollar corporations like PSE.

Why is this change being contemplated? Some say that these issues have become too complex for part-time council members to understand. That is ridiculous. Several of our current council members are attorneys. One is actually a land use attorney. Another holds a Ph.D. Two have served as mayor of Bellevue. Is a state or county judge more qualified to determine what’s best for Bellevue than people who live here and are elected to represent us?

By removing an important safeguard in the development process, this proposal degrades democracy and further jeopardizes our “City in a Park.” Council members may like the idea of removing themselves from controversial and politically risky votes, but is this good governance?

In council elections this fall, citizens should consider whether to support a council member who votes to give powerful developers a further advantage over people who love Bellevue and call it home.

Don Marsh

Bellevue

More in Letters to the Editor

Bellevue’s energy dilemma | Letter

The city of Bellevue is facing a major decision within the next… Continue reading

Region deserves better than 3-county albatross | Letter

Regarding Bill Hirt’s letter (Jan. 5) on Sound Transit. Sadly, Sound Transit… Continue reading

The Seattle Sockeyes should replace Seahawks | Letter

Regarding the Reporter’s illustration in the Jan. 5 issue, the “less traveled”… Continue reading

Pedestrians on Bellevue sidewalks should speak up | Letter

My wife and I walk early in the morning almost every day… Continue reading

East Bellevue Community Council votes for continuance | Letter

Thank you, East Bellevue residents for voting for the continuance of the… Continue reading

‘Thanks’ Sens. Murray and Cantwell | Letter

Due to Sens. Patty Murry and Maria Cantwell’s undying support for Obamacare,… Continue reading

Global warming impacts | Letter

10-year-old writes about climate change concerns

Politicians, media won’t switch gears now | Letter

After looking at a dozen or so news sources this morning only… Continue reading

One way to address homeless shelter issue | Letter

All the concerns about the location of the Bellevue homeless shelter ignores… Continue reading

Expect a circus | Letter

Former President George W. Bush recently gave a “spot-on” speech. We haven’t… Continue reading

Comments on education out of touch with reality | Letter

In her column published in the Oct. 13 edition, Liv Finne as… Continue reading